Case Study

Mr. and Mrs. Jones have been married for 25 years. Mr. Jones is about to retire. They hireNoble Contractors to build an addition to their home. They pay an Architect to design theaddition. The design meets the requirements of the OBC, but not the City bylawsregarding setbacks. The contract with Noble states that "the Contractor shall be paid forall materials and equipment consumed in performing the contract." Noble presents aninvoice for two hammers and three screwdrivers used in the construction of the Jones'home. However, the Jones' refuse to pay, stating that the tools are overpriced and couldhave been purchased on sale for half the invoice price. Noble sues them for the amountof the invoice. The Jones' also argue that the colour of the tiles is not what they ordered.They are unhappy with the general workmanship and want a refund. Anyway, the Cityinspector says it has to be torn down as it's in noncompliance to the City bylaws.

Case Analysis:

1) Will Noble Construction winthe case and be compensated for the amount of the invoice? Briefly explain your opinion.

2) In addition to the actual case, what other "contract law" issues can you identify in this case study?

Your response can be brief and point form.

i just need a different idea or answer which it can help me to get higher mark or better answer that I have

thanks