Question: CASEIt was a regular working day in April 2 0 2 1 , when four business partners gathered together for strategy session for their organization:

CASEIt was a regular working day in April 2021, when four business partners gathered together for strategy session for their organization: Food for Thought (FFT).Background:FFT operated a chain of Quick Service Restaurants (QSR) in business localities in the GTA, Mississauga, Brampton, Oakville, Kitchener, Waterloo, and Cambridge. Their first outlet opened in 2007 in Vaughn and then continued to expand to other areas.FFT outlets offered food and beverages for takeout and delivery only. There was no dine in option available. The rapid expansion of food delivery service provided a strong headwind for FFT. Since their outlets did not require a prominent location, the leasing costs were minimized.The above factors contributed to the success and growth of FFT until Covid struck in early 2020. Most the revenue generated by FFT was from lunch items, afternoon snacks and early evening dinners consumed by clients working in their offices. With 90% of client working from home, the demand for such services almost disappeared overnight. FFT had to downsize its operations, close outlets, and lay off nearly 60% of its workforce.Positive news began to appear in April 2021 with the arrival of vaccines in Canada. Both the Federal and Provincial governments expressed confidence of vaccinating a majority of the population by Fall 2021 and allow restaurant businesses to function normally by November 2021.About business partnersJ.D. Davis (J.D.) is the Senior Vice President- Marketing. Aisha Kumar (Aisha) was the Corporate Chef of FFT. Jose Urquidy (Jose) was the Chief Financial Officer of FFT. Ha-joon Kim (Ha-joon) was the Senior Vice President-Operations Reshaping business strategyThe four business partners set up their meeting with a view to re-orient their business strategy in the context of changes coming to how work would look like when the economy reopened after the pandemic. The goal was to develop a business model which would be relevant with the hybrid work model which was likely to be the norm once post pandemic recovery takes shape.J.D. began the meeting with a discussion of what work would look like in the post-pandemic era. A typical client of FFT was between 2548 years of age and worked in an office setting. Due to their clients workload and schedule, they preferred to buy food from a Quick Service Restaurant so that they could consume the food as and when their work schedule allowed for. With the hybrid work model, they would be attending office two or three days a week and work from home for the remainder. The food consumption pattern would shift from consumption only in the office (pre-pandemic), to consumption both at office and home (post-pandemic). The question therefore was: how can FFT adapt to this change in consumer behaviour?

Aisha thanked J.D. for her insight and began her discussion. She pointed out at this time, there was a very short time lag between food being prepared at FFT and being consumed by the client. The time lag possibly was no more than two hours. As a result, consumers were able to eat freshly prepared food which was packed to retain the attributes of the cooked meal till it reached the consumer. She expressed opinion that the food production process needed a transformation. In addition to the food being prepared and delivered to the client for consumption, there would have to be a secondary process where food would be prepared and packed. The packed food would retain its original attributes for 48 hours. Therefore, a client could order two versions of the same meal the first, which could be consumed in the office within the next two hours and the second, the packed version, which can be taken home, kept in the refrigerator, and consumed on the following day. Ha-joon wanted to point out that while the revenue generated by FFT was from (1) lunch items, (2) afternoon snacks and (3) early evening dinners, the third segment, early evening dinners, had been showing a loss, due to the relatively lower sales, costlier ingredients, and the need for specialized equipment. The group wondered if dropping this segment, early evening dinners, would be advisable and could be an important part of this new strategy.
At this point, Jose took over and pointed out that to implement this strategy, the following steps would be necessary:A new facility, where food preparation and food packaging would take placeBenchmarking studies to analyze performance of similar companiesStatic Budget Variance Analysis to compare the budget versus actual income statement for the most recent periodDetermining whether dropping a segment, early evening dinners, would be advisable.As a next step, they decided to retain the services of Conestoga Consulting (CC), a reputable consulting agency. The scope of work for CC would be to develop financial projections based on the above issues and provide a recommendation as to the best way forward for FFT. Initial meeting with Conestoga Consulting:A group of five consultants met with the four business partners to develop a plan of action. It was decided that the consulting group will develop financial projections as requested and provide a report to FFT in two weeks.Objective: Should FFT lease or construct their own production facilityOption 1: ConstructCosts to incur:Buying land, construct building and getting ready for use (FFT has these funds available in their bank account today so no mortgage is needed)1,100,000Taxes, insurance, and repairs (per year)$90,000Intended years of use15Projected market value in 15 years$ 1,400,000Option 2: Lease Intended years of use15Deposit required today (this deposit will be returned to FFT when the lease contract is complete is 15 years)90,000Annual lease payment$ 120,000Property taxes (annual) to be paid by FFT$ 20,000Insurance (annual) to be paid by FFT$ 16,000Required rate of return 10%Calculate the NPV analysis.2. Objective: To conduct ratio analysis of a comparable company (Waterloo Corporation) and compare with that of the industry.FFT Corporation Comparative Statements of Financial Position 31-Dec-20  Assets20202019 Cash $ 50,000  $ 25,000  Accounts receivable 65,00090,000  Merchandise inventory 30,00060,000  Prepaid Expenses 55,00040,000  Property, plant, and equipment 300,000250,000  Total assets $ 500,000  $ 465,000  Liabilities and shareholders' equity Accounts payable $ 25,000  $ 30,000  Short-term bank loan payable 50,00065,000  Bonds payable 250,000160,000  Common shares 150,00095,000  Retained earnings 125,00075,000  Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 600,000  $ 425,000  FFT Corporation Income Statement Year Ended December 31,2020  Net sales $ 350,000  Cost of goods sold 210,000  Gross profit 140,000  Expenses Operating expenses $ 40,000  Administration expense 22,000  Rent expense 15,000  Total expenses 77,000  Profit before income tax 63,000  Income tax expense 20,000  Profit $ 43,000  Additional information for 20201Cash dividends declared and paid. $ 28,0002Net cash provided by operating activities in 2020 $ 72,000  iiUsing the financial statements and the additional information, calculate the following ratios for 2020.(ii) Compare the companys ratios to the industry ratios found in brackets above. The benchmarks are indicated within brackets besides each ratio.oCurrent ratio (3 to 1) oQuick ratio (2 to 1)oInventory turnover (3 times)oReceivables turnover (8 times) oTimes interest earned (8 times) oDebt to assets ratio (2.5 to 1)oDebt to equity ratio (3 to 1)oProfit margin (14%) oGross profit margin (38%)oDays in inventory (110 days)oDays in receivables (58 days) oReturn on assets (12%) oReturn on equity (14%)oCash current debt coverage ratio (1 time)3. Preparing a static budget variance analysis (compare the actual income statement with the budgeted income statement) and show all variances and indicate Favourable or Unfavourable for each variance and determine the variance amounts for each account along with whether each variance is U/F.FFT CorporationIncome StatementYear Ended December 31,2020  Net sales $ 350,000 Cost of goods sold 210,000 Gross profit 140,000 ExpensesOperating expenses $ 40,000 Administration expense 22,000 Rent expense 15,000 Total expenses 77,000 Profit before income tax 63,000 Income tax expense 20,000 Profit $ 43,000 Additional information for 2020:Cash dividends declared and paid. $ 28,000 Net cash provided by operating activities in 2020 $ 72,000  FFT Corporation Budgeted Income Statement Year Ended December 31,2020  Net sales $ 340,000  Cost of goods sold 220,000  Gross profit 120,000  Expenses Operating expenses $ 44,000  Administration expense 24,000  Rent expense 15,500  Total expenses 83,500  Profit before income tax 36,500  Income tax expense 14,000  Profit $ 22,500 

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 Current Ratio Current Assets Cash Receivables Inventory Prepaid Expenses 50000 65000 30000 55000 200000 Current Liabilities Accounts Payable Bank Lo... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Accounting Questions!