Chapter 11

please solve these cases for me please

1. Remembering the hypothetical scenario presented at the beginning of the chapter, what arguments would you make if you wanted to allege that those who dispose of hazardous wastes, such as toxic chemicals, are strictly liable for the consequences of their dumping? Analogize to the cases in this chapter, arguing that your case is most like those cases used to illustrate abnormally dangerous activities and unlike those cases used to illustrate activities that are not abnormally dangerous.

2. Plaintiff, while employed by defendants to look after their children, is startled by defendants' pet bird when it alights on her face. In trying to avoid the bird she steps back, falls, and fractures her hip. Defendants often let the bird out of its cage and do not lock the cage. Should defendants be held strictly liable? Neagle v. Morgan, 277 N.E.2d 483 (Mass. 1971).