Question: child development are interested in developing ways to increase the spatial-temporal reasoning of preschool children. The researchers want to design a study to evaluate which
child development are interested in developing ways to increase the spatial-temporal reasoning of preschool children. The researchers want to design a study to evaluate which of several methods proposed to accelerate the growth in spatial-temporal reasoning yields the greatest increase in a child's development in this area. There are three methods proposed: three months of playing piano lessons, three months of playing specially developed computer video games, and specially designed games in small groups supervised by a trained instructor. The researchers measure the effectiveness of the three programs by assessing the children and assigning them a reasoning score both before and after their participation in the program. The difference in these two scores is the response variable. A control group is also included to measure the change in reasoning for children not given any special instruction. Twenty-five students were randomly assigned to each of the 4 methods of instruction: no instruction (control), piano lessons, computer video games, or instructor.
Use the SAS output shown here to answer the questions.
The ANOVA Procedure
Class Levels Values
Method 4 Computer video instructor no instruction piano lessons
Number of observed Read 100
Number of observations used 100
The ANOVA Procedure
Dependent Variable: Effectiveness score
Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value PR>F
Model 3 725.235500 242.411833 24.44 <.0001>
Error 96 952.302400 9.919817
Corrected
Total 96 1679.537900
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE Effectiveness score Mean
0.432997 79.51462 3.149574 3.961000
The ANOVA Procedure
Tukey's Studenitized Range test for effectiveness score
Alpha 0.05
Error Degrees of Freedom 96
Error Mean Square 9.919817
Critical Value of Studentized Range 3.69761
Minimum Significant difference 2.3292
Means with the same letter are not significantly different
Tukey Grouping Mean N Method
A 7.4000 25 Instructor
B 4.7640 25 Computer Video
B
B 3.7920 25 Piano Lessons
C -0.1120 25 no instruction
The ANOVA Procedure
Alpha .05
Error Degrees of Freedom 96
Error Mean Square 9.919817
Critical Value of t 2.69403
Minumum Significant Difference 2.3999
Means with the same letter are not significantly different
Bon Grouping Mean N Method
A 7.4000 25 instructor
B 4.7640 25 computer video
B
B 3.7920 25 Piano Lessons
C -0.1120 25 No instruction
(a). What are the values for the sum of squares between and the sum of squares within and their degrees of freedoms?
(b) State the null and alternative hypotheses being tested by the F-statistic in the ANOVA
(c). Is there a significant difference in the mean effectiveness of the methods of instruction units produced between four different methods using = .05.
(d) If the differences between methods are significantly different, use the Tukey's method to see which methods are different. Compare the results with that of the Bonferroni.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
