Chip makers $($Qualcomm and Intel, for instance$)$ and Smart Phone manufacturers $($Apple and Samsung, for instance$)$ belong to two oligopoly markets. However, these markets are connected because smart phones cannot work without chips. In $2017$ we have seen a complex battle over patents and how much license fees should be between Apple and Qualcomm, the largest players in each market. They were fighting with lawsuits in the US$,$ UK and China. Apple ended the litigation with Qualcomm in $2019$ and agreed to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon chips because Intel$-$Apple were not able to develop $5$G chips, Samsung and Wawei already have it$,$ and Apple found itself cornered without $5$G chips. However, the discussion of license fee models is still relevant. Read this Reuters' article from $2017$ about the license fee model supported by Qualcomm, Nokia and Ericsson, and the license fee model that Apple, Google, Mercedes, and VW would like to have: $1.$ Show with an example how these license fee models are different. $2.$ As a consumer of final products and not chips, what model favors you? Why?