Question: code class = asciimath > Mr . Vet was considering buying an MRI scanner. After negotiating with national and international suppliers, he found two that

code class="asciimath">Mr. Vet was considering buying an MRI scanner. After negotiating with national and international suppliers, he found two that interested him. Supplier 1 was one of the Spanish suppliers Mr. Vet worked with the most. This company offered Vet Center the MRI-A, which normally cost 280 thousands, for 240 thousands. Although the machine would only have a one-year guarantee, Mr. Vet expected the scanner to have a useful life of 10 years under normal circumstances, with zero salvage value. The operating cost of this machine in the first year would be approximately 12,000 including maintenance costs. Mr. Vet believed that the operating costs of the MRI-A machine would increase at a rate of 6% per year, compared with an anticipated general inflation rate of 2%. Supplier 2 was a French company that Mr. Vet got to know on his trip to France. It offered the MRI-B, which cost 200 thousands. Although the purchase price would be lower, the operating costs of the MRI-B machine would be higher than those of the MRI-A. The MRI-B machine's operating expenses in the first year would be around 16,000, growing at a rate of 6% per year. In addition, the MRI-B would need a general overhaul at the end of the third and sixth years of its eight-year useful life. The supplier offered to carry out these two overhauls for 12,000 and 18,000, respectively, payable at the time of each overhaul. The overhaul expenses would be amortized over the rest of the machine's useful life. Mr. Vet and his financial adviser prepared cost analyses for the two machines. The cost of capital for Vet Center was estimated to be 12%. Mr. Vet felt, however, that the 12% discount rate was not consistent with Vet Center's capital structure. He argued that Vet Center's shareholder equity and retained earnings had no interest charges. As a result, he thought the proper discount rate to use should not be 12%, but only 10%, the cost of borrowing. Having consulted experts, Mr. Vet was told that he would be able to sell the MRI-A machine after eight years for 62,500. Vet Center would use straight-line depreciation and would be subject to corporation tax at a rate of 35%. All cash flows were assumed to occur at the end of December. You have been hired by Mr. Vet to calculate the profitability of these two MRI scanners and to recommend the one that will maximize the economic value to Vet Center. Which machine would you recommend, basing your analysis on the net present value (NP V) rule? What is the appropriate discount rate to use? Why? Using the internal rate of return (IRR) rule, which machine would do you recommend? How do you explain any difference between the IRR and NPV rankings? Which rule is better? Use a BAII Plus Professional Calculator to solve.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Accounting Questions!