Complete all three parts for this case analysis assignment.

Part 1: Sexual Harassment

Look up the following cases using LexisNexis:

1. Gleason v. Mesirow Financial, Inc., 118 F.3d 1134 (7th Cir. 1997)
2. Brill v. Lante , 119 F.3d 1266 (7th Cir. 1997)
3. Guidry v. Zale Corp. , 969 F. Supp. 988 (M.D. La. 1997)
4. Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka , 970 F. Supp. 833 (D. Kan. 1997)
5. After reviewing these cases, determine whether each one would be considered sexual harassment and explain why or why not (the court's rationale).

Part 2: Hiring Discrimination

Look up Fesel v. Masonic Home, 17 FEP Cases 330 (Del. 1978) using LexisNexis. In this suit brought by a male nurse's aide who was denied employment, explain who would win and why (rationale in hiring discrimination based on sex).

Part 3: Conclusion

Conclude with a summary of the case findings that might serve as a brief guide of key principles for business leaders.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Part 1 Sexual Harassment 1 Gleason v Mesirow Financial Inc 118 F3d 1134 7th Cir 1997 This case involved unwelcome sexual advances made by a supervisor The court ruled it as sexual harassment based on ... View the full answer