complete form based on

milestone one

In this Change Analysis Paper, we will examine two publicly traded companies and analyze their methods of handling a significant change within their organizations. Specifically, we will focus on the integration of the six images of managing change, evaluate the effectiveness of the change initiatives, and suggest potential improvements that could have enhanced the probability of successful implementation. The two companies chosen for this analysis are Company A and Company B.

Company A is a multinational technology company that recently underwent a significant change in its organizational structure. The change involved transitioning from a hierarchical structure to a more agile and flat organizational model. The company employed the image of "coercive power" to drive this change. The top management took a top-down approach and enforced the change through strict directives, policies, and restructured reporting lines.

The change process at Company A was effective to some extent, as it resulted in faster decision-making and improved cross-functional collaboration. However, some employees experienced resistance due to the sudden shift in power dynamics and the loss of clear hierarchical structures. This resulted in a temporary decline in employee morale and productivity. To increase the probability of successful implementation, Company A could have focused more on the "rational persuasion" image by involving employees in the decision-making process and communicating the benefits of the new structure more effectively.

Company B is a global retail chain that recently underwent a significant change in its business model by embracing e-commerce and digital transformation. The company utilized the image of "collaborative network" to drive this change. Instead of imposing the change from the top, Company B formed cross-functional teams and empowered employees at all levels to contribute their ideas and expertise. The company also fostered a culture of innovation and encouraged experimentation.

The change initiative at Company B was highly effective, resulting in increased online sales, improved customer experience, and enhanced operational efficiency. By embracing the collaborative network image, the company successfully tapped into the collective knowledge and creativity of its workforce. However, to further enhance the probability of success, Company B could have also incorporated the "transformational leadership" image by inspiring and empowering employees to embrace the change and align their personal goals with the organization's strategic objectives.

In conclusion, the Change Analysis Paper compared and contrasted the methods used by Company A and Company B to handle significant changes within their organizations. Company A employed the image of "coercive power" and faced mixed outcomes, while Company B utilized the image of the "collaborative network" and achieved significant success. Both companies could have further improved their change initiatives by integrating additional images such as "rational persuasion" and "transformational leadership" to enhance employee engagement, communication, and alignment with organizational goals.

By understanding the different approaches to change management and considering the effectiveness of each method, organizational management can make informed decisions to increase the probability of successfully implementing strategic change initiatives.