Completely reword these 3 paragraphs separately with the same ideas and word count. ( No using paraphrasing tool or I will report the answer) Only college-level writing, please! I will give thumbs up if good! Do not change quotations

Faqir Chand doubted the ideas of religious visions and miracles regularly, primarily because he believed in the power of suggestion. The expression "power of suggestion" refers to people's proclivity to make realities out of concepts given to them. In a religious context, it refers to people's willingness to follow religious figureheads' words without a doubt to find significance or reason in their own lives. This allows for mind control because most spiritual leaders can feel a person's inner turmoil and decide what they "need" in life. They fill a void in a person's life and take advantage of it. This makes them more vulnerable and receptive to the prospect of "miracles" or divine visions. "Experiences of seeing inner light, listening to wondrous melodies, and feeling sensations of being out of one's body but momentary reflections of our psychological state," according to the author (The Unknoing Sge 91). Another thing to consider is how strong the mind is when it comes to perceiving these events. While spiritual leaders lead the study and determine meanings, it is ultimately our mind that determines how we view these encounters and how much we allow ourselves to be influenced by them. Our minds contain a force that can be distorted and redirected, but it is ultimately a power that we can harness if we learn to construct our own meanings.

The term implies that the majority of science that has been theorized and accepted has always come from a thought that questioned the accepted way of thinking at the time. For example, Nicolaus Copernicus proposed that the sun, not Earth, was at the universe's core. This was in sharp contrast to the majority's generally held belief that the Earth was at the heart of the universe. This sparked research into proving heliocentrism, which ultimately led to the acceptance that the Earth does, in reality, revolve around the sun. None of this would be possible without the radical thinking of someone who has challenged what others have known as fact. It must be rational and, most importantly, grounded in empiricism to be done well. When a philosophical theory can be supported by empirical evidence, it is referred to as science. "If anything is really beyond science's grasp, it will invariably turn up as a remainder," according to The Remainder Conjecture. This means that things that cannot be proven scientifically will remain philosophy and will be debated and built upon in the future.

Artificial intelligence is a relatively recent concept that has become a hot topic of discussion in the last 20 years or so. Many of the advances in artificial intelligence were mostly for entertainment or trade. Many of our suggested items or shows, for example, are based on data obtained by computer systems, which then use their algorithms to create a list of media it thinks we'll like. We're approaching a time when artificial intelligence will eventually take over human-occupied work. This change in labor is causing increasing concern. What could seem to be science fiction might soon become a reality. Elon Musk recently launched a Kickstarter campaign for a neural connection that can be implanted in the body and send data to external sources. How do we expect this undertaking to go off without a hitch if humans struggle with consciousness and are cursed to constantly doubt their place in the world? New A.I./body combining ethical rules will have to be enforced. It's a new frontier that needs to be extensively investigated before it can be commercialized and controlled.