Conclusion Labor law The Brunow Hair Saloon receives a set of proposals for collective bargaining from the Brunow Barbers Union, composed of the eight (8) barbers in the establishment. The owner refuses to bargain with the union because  the barbershop is simply a service establishment  the barbers are not paid on time basis but the sum of P100.00 per haircut, and  they cannot form a union since they number less than ten. Which of the foregoing argument is tenable? Why? (3%ation, and Conclusion Labor law The Brunow Hair Saloon receives a set of proposals for collective bargaining from the Brunow Barbers Union, composed of the eight (8) barbers in the establishment. The owner refuses to bargain with the union because the barbershop is simply a service establishment the barbers are not paid on time basis but the sum of P100.00 per haircut, and  they cannot form a union since they number less than ten. Which of the foregoing argument is tenable? Why?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

None of the arguments presented by the owner of Brunow Hair Saloon are tenable for refusing to barga... View the full answer