Consider a case in which a Subaru driver is "t-boned" by a Dodge in the middle of an intersection. Both drivers submit claims to their respective insurance companies asserting that they are not at fault. After an investigation, it is discovered that the driver of the Dodge ran a red light and that the driver of the Subaru both had the right of way and could not have reasonably been expected to anticipate and avoid the accident. As a result, the Dodge driver is deemed to be at fault and his insurance covers repairs to the Subaru. What type of reasoning is utilized here? Group of answer choices Analogical Ex Ante Ex Post