Question: Consider Moustafa's case study on Egypt. How does judicialization in authoritarian settings differ from judicialization in liberal democracies? In your answer: First address why it
Consider Moustafa's case study on Egypt. How does judicialization in authoritarian settings differ from judicialization in liberal democracies? In your answer:
- First address why it is puzzling to see judicialization unfold in authoritarian settings (compared to liberal democracies).
- Explain, in a nutshell, Moustafa's argument about why judicialization occurred in Egypt.
- Briefly address whether you think Epp's argument on support structures could explain judicialization of politics in Egypt.
- Finally, explain the limitations of judicialization in authoritarian settings by giving one example from the reading.
Bonus: Based on the Week 8 readings and Prof. Richer's lecture, consider the relationship between judicialization of politics and democracy. Do you think the rise of support structures and judicialization creates a more democratic society? Or, do you think these processes are detrimental to democracy? Give specific examples from the Week 8 readings/lecture to support your point.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
In authoritarian settings it is puzzling to see judicialization unfold compared to liberal democracies because authoritarian regimes typically concent... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
