Consider the assignment you submitted during Module 6, and choose 4 questions outlined on pp. 300-303 of your textbook to assess your assignment. When posting your thread, make sure to post each question and your response to the question as you assess

One connection to a bible verse

2 Four hundred word minimum

One a p a reference

Is your issue or focus underpinned by theory? Is it clear which the- ory or model you have adopted? How up to date are your references? Have you included the most up- to-date work in your area? Have you managed to identify and get hold of the work of key writ- ers in your particular area? Have you ensured that you have paid due attention to 'classic' sources? Have you used a variety of sources or are you over-reliant upon certain authors? Have you included or acknowledged competing theories or viewpoints, or simply selected literature that supports your hypothesis? is it clear to the reader how your research relates to what has been done before, or builds upon existing knowledge? . In your literature review do you merely identify and describe, with no real critical edge? Have you been analytical enough? . Have you explored all possible sources? Your methodology . Have you clearly explained your broad epistemological assump- tions? Does the methodology reflect these assumptions throughout? . Do you clearly identify and explain your choice of research design? . Have you explained the rationale behind your chosen means of col- lecting information? If it is an existing instrument, whose is it? Why did you choose it? Is it clear to the reader why your methods were the most appropriate ones for your research question? . Have you made it clear who the subjects are? And to what popula- tion these subjects belong? Is it clear how they were selected? . Did you undertake any piloting of your data collection instruments? What was the outcome of any piloting? If so, have you reported these in your write-up? Have you been explicit in outlining how data were analysed? . Have you evaluated the methodology? Can you identify what was strong and what was weaker? Are you making assumptions? You know what you did in terms of research methods, but would the reader? Have you expressed your- self clearly and given adequate details? Would someone else be able to replicate your study on the basis of the information you've given? . Have you justified your key decisions? 301