Consider these two causal inductive arguments: Every day of my life, the sun has risen in the morning. Tomorrow morning is another day; therefore, the sun will probably rise. Every time I flick this switch, the living room light goes on. Therefore, this switch probably controls the living room light. 1. For your initial post, respond to the questions below. Write a well-developed, well-written original post that engages with the overall theme of the discussion and specifically answers the individual questions from the discussion prompt. Do these arguments seem obvious? Why or why not? b. Understanding the structure of inductive arguments, how do you rate the strength or weakness of perceived causal relationships in arguments? c. Are there ways in which these arguments can be complicated? How so? d. To what extent does the specific wording of each argument matter? Are there words that complicate the arguments? e. What inductive (strong/weak) arguments do we rely on as if they were deductive (true/false) in our daily lives? Example: A green traffic light meaning it is safe to go seems like a deductive "true" argument, but is it really?