Copyright laws exist to protect authors and publishers rights, but also to balance that protection with access and innovation. In 1999, two teenagers created the file-sharing program Napster. Within its first year, the service surpassed 20 million users. Many Napster users shared music files with each other, but without any compensation to the artists and producers who made the music, sparking a series of legal battles over copyright and distribution. In 2001, an appellate panel upheld a previous ruling that Napster violated copyright laws, stating that, Repeated and exploitative unauthorized copies of copyrighted works were made to save the expense of purchasing authorized copies.

Artists were divided on the benefits and harms of Napster. Over 70 artists formed Artists Against Piracy in coalition with major record companies to combat the piracy occurring on Napster and other peer-to-peer internet services. In contrast, some established artists such as Neil Young saw piracy as the new radio and applauded the potential to reach larger audiences and drive additional sales through increased popularity. Seeing both the benefits and detriments of piracy, singer Norah Jones stated, If people hear it Im happyits great that young people who dont have a lot of money can listen to music and be exposed to new things But I also understand its not ideal for the record industry, and a lot of young artists who wont make any [money] off their album sales, but at least they can tour.

Although court rulings forced Napster to terminate its file-sharing business, Napsters innovations stimulated payment-based services, such as iTunes, Pandora, and many others. But the availability of such services has not put an end to the debate surrounding artist compensation with digital music, as seen with Taylor Swifts open letter to Apple in 2015. Swifts albums, along with the music of many other artists, were going to be streamed at no cost to new Apple Music customers over the first three months of service without any compensation to the artists. In her open letter, Swift stated, Im not sure you know that Apple Music will not be paying writers, producers, or artists for those three months. I find it to be shocking, disappointing, and completely unlike this historically progressive and generous company. Within a few hours, Apple responded by changing the terms of its agreement in order to compensate artists at a reduced rate.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* Write a short description of the situation. Defined as a problem, that is, explain what the problem really is. in 75 to 100 words please