Corp# show running$-$config

interface GigabitEthernet$0/1$

description Server Farm

ip address $172\mathrm{.}16\mathrm{.}1\mathrm{.}1255\mathrm{.}255\mathrm{.}255\mathrm{.}0$

ip access$-$group FileServerAccess out

$!$

$!$

ip access$-$list extended FileServerAccess

deny tcp $172\mathrm{.}18\mathrm{.}200\mathrm{.}00\mathrm{.}0\mathrm{.}0\mathrm{.}255$ host $172\mathrm{.}16\mathrm{.}1\mathrm{.}15$ eq ftp

deny tcp $172\mathrm{.}18\mathrm{.}200\mathrm{.}00\mathrm{.}0\mathrm{.}0\mathrm{.}255$ host $172\mathrm{.}16\mathrm{.}1\mathrm{.}15$ eq ftp$-$data

deny tcp $172\mathrm{.}18\mathrm{.}200\mathrm{.}00\mathrm{.}0\mathrm{.}0\mathrm{.}255$ host $172\mathrm{.}16\mathrm{.}1\mathrm{.}15$ eq telnet

$!$

Refer to the exhibit. A new network policy requires an ACL denying FTP and Telnet access to a Corp file server from all interns. The address of the file server is $172\mathrm{.}16\mathrm{.}1\mathrm{.}15$ and all interns are assigned addresses in the $172\mathrm{.}18\mathrm{.}200\mathrm{.}0/24$ network. After implementing the ACL, no one in the Corp network can access any of the servers. What is the problem?

radio$\_$button$\_$unchecked

Named ACLs require the use of port numbers.

radio$\_$button$\_$unchecked

Inbound ACLs must be routed before they are processed.

radio$\_$button$\_$unchecked

The ACL is implicitly denying access to all the servers.

radio$\_$button$\_$unchecked

The ACL is applied to the interface using the wrong direction.

Question $12$