could you please answer the questions

Question 1: Read the opinion of the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in the case of Blysma v. Burger King. By way of background, the common law rule is that you cannot sue someone for causing you emotional distress unless one of three factors is present: (1) the emotional distress was intentionally caused by the person you are suing; (2) the emotional distress is associated with some physical injury; or (3) the emotional distress is so severe that it has a serious physical manifestation. An example of factor #1 would be the jilted lover who posts lies about and compromising pictures of his ex-girlfriend on Facebook with the intention of causing her emotional distress. An example of factor #2 is someone who suffers a burn as the result of someone's carelessness and sees a hideous scar every time he or she looks in the mirror. An example of #3 is a grandparent who sees a texting driver heading directly for his or her grandchild and, even though the driver corrected the error in time, is so startled that he or she has a heart attack or stroke. Discuss the following aspects of the case: This case involves an incident that occurred in Washington and that involves Washington law. On what basis would the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon have jurisdiction in this case? Could the plaintiff have filed his case in the Oregon state courts? Why or why not? Why did the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals certify the question to the Washington Supreme Court? What does the Washington Supreme Court have to do with a case filed within the borders of the state of Oregon