Could you please answer those questions for FIN case 21 aaurira textiles

Case 21- Aurora Textiles 1. The Zinser project required explicit consideration of a very wide variety of factors in the design and construct of the analysis. Provide examples of the considerations discussed in the case that could have a direct impact-positive or negative - on the NPV of the Zinser project that are directly related to each of the following areas: (a) Aurora Textiles (b) the textile industry in general, (c) global, national and macro factors 2. The case assessment was based on a ten-year horizon. However, given Aurora's financial condition and recent history, there is some likelihood that Aurora might not last more than a few years or so before failing as a going concern. How does that change your perspective on how to estimate the NPV for the Zinser project? Facing that reality, what specific factor would you want to adjust in your consideration of NPV for Zinser? Does that change make the investment look more or less attractive? Why or why not? 3. Would the shareholders be better off with the investment in the new Zinser machine, or should those funds be instead used to directly pay a (relatively large) dividend? On what basis would you make that assessment? What would be your recommendation to the Board? Primanly because? tene mak Case 21- Aurora Textiles 1. The Zinser project required explicit consideration of a very wide variety of factors in the design and construct of the analysis. Provide examples of the considerations discussed in the case that could have a direct impact-positive or negative - on the NPV of the Zinser project that are directly related to each of the following areas: (a) Aurora Textiles (b) the textile industry in general, (c) global, national and macro factors 2. The case assessment was based on a ten-year horizon. However, given Aurora's financial condition and recent history, there is some likelihood that Aurora might not last more than a few years or so before failing as a going concern. How does that change your perspective on how to estimate the NPV for the Zinser project? Facing that reality, what specific factor would you want to adjust in your consideration of NPV for Zinser? Does that change make the investment look more or less attractive? Why or why not? 3. Would the shareholders be better off with the investment in the new Zinser machine, or should those funds be instead used to directly pay a (relatively large) dividend? On what basis would you make that assessment? What would be your recommendation to the Board? Primanly because? tene mak