Create a positive feed back for this discussion post and make it a paragraph long:

The use of informants in narcotics investigations can be really complicated, especially when these informants are drug users or dealers themselves. While having inside information can help police take down bigger drug operations, giving informants "virtual immunity" creates some serious ethical problems. Basically, it raises the question of whether it's okay to let someone off the hook for their crimes just because they're helping law enforcement. According to Lieberman (2024), police departments need clear rules for working with informants, like checking their credibility, making sure their information is accurate, and keeping detailed records of interactions.

The problem is that without strict guidelines, informants might lie or exaggerate information to protect themselves or get better deals. This can lead to wrongful arrests or an unfair justice system. Instead of giving total immunity it's better to offer something like a reduced sentence or other incentives while still holding informants accountable for their actions. Thereneeds to be a balance between catching bigger criminals and making sure justice is actually fair for everyone involved.