Criteria

Exemplary

$4$ points

Accomplished

$3$ points

Developing

$2$ points

Beginning $-$ Needs Improvement

$0$ points

Criterion Score

Depth of Reflection

Reflection demonstrates an exemplary understanding of critical thinking in applying, analyzing and evaluating key evaluation and feedback competencies and theories from assigned readings, instructional demonstrations, media, online discussions activities and$/$or assignments. Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences and personal examples. All components of the assignment were answered with great competence, depth of understanding and clarity. Mastery of subject matter is demonstrated, evident, and measurable.

Reflection demonstrates an accomplished level of critical thinking in applying, analyzing and$/$or evaluating key question concepts, competencies and theories of evaluation and feedback from assigned readings, instructional demonstrations, media, online discussions activities and$/$or assignments. Connections were made through explanations, inferences and$/$or examples. Action plans for improvement were evident in the summary of learning.

Reflection demonstrates a developing level of critical thinking in applying, analyzing and$/$or evaluating key concepts, responses to and theories from assigned readings, instructional demonstrations, media, online discussions activities and$/$or assignments. Connections were made required further explanations, inferences and$/$or examples from the case study for a course of action or improvement. Answers were somewhat clear but require further clarity and detail in answering to the fullest.

The response demonstrates a lack of or absence of self$-$reflection on$,$ or personalization of$,$ the theories, concepts and$/$or strategies presented in responses to the case study. Critical viewpoints are weak or absent alongside supporting interpretations are missing, inappropriate and$/$or insufficiently supported to answer the questions in a measurable and meaningful manner. Case study examples related to learning have not been indicated or are non$-$applicable to the solution presented. Action plan for improvement of the food service manager is lacking or absent from the question's response with limited or absent steps providing achievable and measurable progress for improvement.

Score of Depth of Reflection,$/4$

Required Components

The content includes all components of each question and exceeds the learning requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the document is addressed thoroughly and thoughtfully. Learning is impactful and details action steps for improvement in response to the questions which are achievable and measurable.

The content is good and adequate in answering questions and meets the required learning providing sufficient detail. All questions or parts of the assignment were completed or addressed as required. The summary of learning provides sufficient detail and development to include the necessary steps with enough detail for a continuous path of self$-$improvement.

The answers required components are within a developing stage with required further development. Most questions and parts of the document are addressed although would benefit from further personal insight or reflection. Responses to the questions are evident although more details and action steps for improvement are needed to reach an achievable and measurable successful path.

Content provided to the questions was attempted although requires further development with some components either missing or requiring further details. Some questions or parts of the assignment are missing or not thoroughly addressed as required. The learning lacks the necessary steps with enough detail for a continuous path of self$-$improvement.

Score of Required Components,$/4$

Structure

Writing is clear, concise and well organized. The writing format is constructed in a manner that is meaningful and personal. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. The answers were structured in a manner easy to read with a depth of clarity and provided examples or citing the necessity of excellent action steps a food manager would respond with.

Writing is both clear and structured in a concise manner. Thoughts are expressed in a logical manner. The summary of learning was written in a manner that is adequate, clear and easy to follow depicting examples of the necessity of self$-$improvement to develop a continuous path of professional development.

Writing is still developing with the attention needed to properly structure the document and improve upon a concise writing style. Thoughts are expressed but need improvement in conceptualization and logical sequencing. The summary of learning lacks coherence and sequence of thought with limited or no examples provided of personal insight or reflective practice. The document requires further development.

Writing lacks structure and coherence