Question: Critically discuss this statement. 'The 'mere presence rule' which was enshrined in the Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein case is of little value in the

Critically discuss this statement. 'The 'mere presence rule' which was enshrined in the Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein case is of little value in the twenty-first century. Besides being a hindrance to the performance of commerce, its archaic foundations to found jurisdiction over a foreign litigant make a mockery of legal theory.

Step by Step Solution

3.37 Rating (163 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Critical Discussion of the Mere Presence Rule The statement regarding the mere presence rule established in Maharanee of Baroda v Wildenstein sparks a debate worth discussing While it holds some valid... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!