Darwin is a 60-year-old software engineer for Compuswerve, Inc. Recently, the company went through a reorganization process meant to revampthe business and the work it does. The directors want to rework the company as a fresh, hip business with cutting-edge knowledge from young, creative-minded employees. Obviously, Darwin doesn't fit into the directors'vision, so the managers wish to replace him. Sure enough, a few weeks later Compuswerve hires some new employees, and Darwin is offered a severance plan and dismissed.

Which of the following, if true, would legally support the company's decision to fire and replace Darwin?

What are the suggested answers, mine would be if the company had more than 20 employees, and if there were more highly skilled workers in the organization who could take his place?

Am I correct