Question: David Theo is analyzing Amazing Fund using Top-Down and Bottom-Up analysis, and against Russell 1000 benchmark. The evaluation used the Fund and Benchmark performance over
David Theo is analyzing Amazing Fund using Top-Down and Bottom-Up analysis, and against Russell 1000 benchmark. The evaluation used the Fund and Benchmark performance over a 1 year period and the results are provided below in annualised terms.
Excess Returns and Volatility:
| Average Excess returns above risk free | Volatility | |
| Fund | 14.3% | 25.6% |
| Benchmark | 12.9% | 16.9% |
Regression Results:
| Alpha | Standard error (Alpha) | Beta | Standard Error (Beta) | Standard Deviation (Errors) | |
| Fund | -1.27% | 0.95% | 1.7 | 4.65% | 19% |
Bottom-Up Attribution Analysis Results
Selection Effect = -0.9%
Allocation Effect = 2.5%.
You are required to:
a) ( 2 marks) Explain why the alpha from the Top-Down analysis does not equal the over/under performance of the Amazing fund through Bottom-up analysis.
b) (2 marks) Explain if the Amazing Fund's fund manager has skills to perform well consistently in the future? (You can use 1.96 as the 95% two-tail T-statistic for your answer)
c) (1 mark) Calculate the Information Ratio of the fund.
d) (1 mark) Explain if the fund is expected to have a large cap or a small cap bias?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
