Deciphering the Complex Contractual Dispute$-$Defendent A$-$A technology consulting services pappellate court ruled in Company A$\text{'}$s favor. The court held that payment by Company A was indeed contingent upon both the acceptance of services and the receipt of payment from the client, in accordance with the contract's clear condition precedent. As a result, Company A was relieved of its obligation to pay the Contractor for the services provided. rovider and Defendent B$-$Contracting Company$-$ Company A was in breach of contract and after