Question: Devitt's Scientific Realism has been refuted by Carnap's anti-realist arguments. But, since constructive empiricism is incompatible with Carnap's anti-realist arguments, the only tenable form of
Devitt's Scientific Realism has been refuted by Carnap's anti-realist arguments. But, since constructive empiricism is incompatible with Carnap's anti-realist arguments, the only tenable form of anti-realism is pluralism, which implies that there's nothing more to scientific truth than a pragmatic choice of which language to speak. But if that's all there is to scientific truth, then science is pointless. So, it follows that science is pointless.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
