Discuss the mirror-image rule, and how it is different than the way contracts are treated under the UCC. Is it a concern that a minor deviation in an acceptance can effectively reject a contract? Why or why not? What if this was not the intent of the parties at the time of entering into the agreement?

Kate offers to paint Rogers house for $2,500. Roger attempts to accept the offer by saying, Great. But, you have to paint the storage shed in the backyard as well. Kate does not respond and decides to take a different painting job. Roger is angry, particularly when he learns that the next closest offer is twice as expensive. He wants to sue Kate for her failure to perform. What is the likely result?

last time I put down a reference link, chegg removed it because that violated integrity guidelines