DO ALL OR DONT DO 1 pls do them correctly dont guess

Previous Page Next Page Page 3 of 10 Question 3 (1 point) Is the logic in the following argument good? Premise 1: If the expected value of going to court is higher than the settlement we've been offered, we should go to court. Premise 2: The expected value of going to court is negative. Conclusion: We should not go to court. Only if we believe premise 1 It depends on whether premise 2 is acceptable Yes No Previous Page Next Page Page 4 of 10 Question 4 (1 point) What is the problem with the following argument? Premise 1: If expansion into veterinary products will increase profits, we should expand. Premise 2: Expansion into veterinary products will not increase profits. Conclusion: We should not expand into veterinary products. The logic is weak The premises are irrelevant There is no problem Veterinary products are never a good idea Previous Page Next Page Page 5 of 10 Question 5 (1 point) What is the most obvious problem with the following argument: Premise 1: Jahan and Jorgen are Ryerson grads who know how to brush their teeth, wash their hands, and use the bathroom. Premise 2: The best explanation for for premise 1 is that Ryerson teaches the mentioned skills. Conclusion: Ryerson teaches the mentioned skills. The conclusion is false. Premise 1 is not plausible. Premise 2 is not plausible. The premises do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion