Do you agree or disagree with your peer's initial post? Why or why not?

What examples from the textbook or outside resources $($such as news articles$)$ support or dispute your peer's stance, and how?

Did your peer provide any insight or information that changed your opinion about the TB$\text{'}$m a business major. It is my firm conviction that businesses bear the responsibility of monitoring and overseeing the social, economic, and environmental consequences of their operations. This duty becomes even more crucial when we consider the potential ramifications of their actions if left unchecked. Without proper consideration of the repercussions, businesses could potentially evade accountability for their actions. They might argue that they were unaware of the harm they were causing to the environment or even to human lives due to the absence of tracking mechanisms. While implementing the Triple Bottom Line $($TBL$)$ approach can aid in monitoring its impact, excessive focus on it may divert attention from profit generation, potentially jeopardizing the survival of the business. Therefore, I believe that incorporating the TBL approach within certain limits can prove immensely beneficial. This not only enhances the company's reputation and aligns with its mission but also ensures long$-$term benefits for the consumers of their services. However, it is important to acknowledge that this approach can be a double$-$edged sword, as it requires a delicate balance between social and environmental responsibility and financial sustainability.L$?$ If so$,$ how?