Does India's example support or refute the argument that family planning services should be readily available to reduce population growth?

a$.$ Because India's population has stabilized with extensive family planning availability, this supports the use of programs to promote family planning.

b$.$ India's example suggests that there is no benefit to promoting family planning services

c$.$ Because India's population has stabilized with extensive family planning availability, this may not work elsewhere due to unique characteristics of the Indian economy.

d$.$ India's example suggests that family planning services are always successful in slowing population growth.

e$.$ Although India's population has not stabilized with extensive family planning availability, this does not mean that family planning is ineffective.