Question: Does this result really make sense? Is the courts concern that allowing this postdischarge relief would mean that a bankruptcy discharge is a perpetual license
Does this result really make sense? Is the courts concern that allowing this postdischarge relief would mean that a bankruptcy discharge is a perpetual license to discharge student loans based on events that occur years after the bankruptcy discharge is granted well founded? Suppose it is scheduled to take thirty years to pay off student loans; in year 4, the student-borrower, now Debtor, declares Chapter 7 bankruptcy, student loans not being discharged; in year 6, the person is rendered disabled. What public policy is offended if the person is allowed to reopen the bankruptcy and use the postbankruptcy event as a basis for claiming a hardship discharge of student loans?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
