Draft one legal analysis paragraph for each question, for a total of four short, concise paragraphs, with properly formatted and embedded US Supreme Court case law (one case per response, for a total of four USSC cases). Do not include the question. Only submit the response.

City of Indianapolis v. Edmond

• Last week, Dan Slater found himself in an A.T.F. roadblock checkpoint titled, "MARSS" (Miltary Assault Rifle Searches and Seizures). Slater's vehicle was lawfully stopped (it was randomly chosen). Because of the ongoing investigation against him, the agents had a K-9 drug-sniffing dog walk around and within Slater's vehicle. A small baggy with a powdery residue was found inside a pack of cigarettes in the glove box.
• Using Westlaw, find a U.S. Supreme Court case, where City of Indianapolis v. Edmond was compared or contrasted in the facts and/or analysis, to discuss the most likely outcome of the Dan Slater roadblock case.
• Concluding Sentence: Therefore, based on [ ], the baggy will most likely be [admissible or inadmissible].