Question: Duquesne Light Company is evaluating two alternatives for generating power. Alternative A Build a coal-powered generating facility. Investment Cost = US$20.0 million Annual Power Sales
Duquesne Light Company is evaluating two alternatives for generating power.
Alternative A
Build a coal-powered generating facility.
Investment Cost = US$20.0 million
Annual Power Sales = US$1.0 million
Annual Operations and
Maintenance Costs = US$0.20 million
Annual Community Benefits = US$0.50 million
Alternative B
Build a hydroelectric generating facility.
Investment Cost = US$30.0 million
Annual Power Sales = US$0.80 million
Annual Operations and
Maintenance (O&M) Costs = US$0.10 million
Annual Community Benefits
Flood Control = US$0.60 million
Irrigation = US$0.20 million
Recreation = US$0.10 million
New Industries = US$0.40 million
For a useful life of 50 years and interest rate of 5% for each alternative, which alternative should Duquesne Light Company implement?
Use the conventional benefit-cost ratio method to select the better alternative
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
