Eileen entered into a contract with Cellular One for the purchase of a cell phone

and for a year's worth of cell phone service.A week after the contract was made,

Eileen suffered a stroke and was rendered mentally incompetent.Unfortunately,

Eileen no longer had any use for the phone and she was unable to understand the

service agreement, why she was being billed or even what the purpose of the phone

was.Cellular One was told of Eileen's stroke but they insisted on enforcing the

contract and they sued Eileen.You are the judge, how would you rule and why?