esponding to Conflicting Stakeholder Demands on IDEAS $($e$.$g$.,$ Shareholder Activism$)$:

Scenario Focus: Musketeer United faces simultaneous, conflicting pressures. For example, one influential investor group or activist shareholder faction demands a significant rollback of IDEAS programs, citing costs, "wokeness," or legal risks of "reverse discrimination." Simultaneously, another powerful group $($e$.$g$.,$ employees, major customers, other investors$)$ demands increased investment and transparency in IDEAS, linking it to innovation, talent retention, and ethical responsibility.