Explain clearly why courts can only adjudicate (decide) based on an actual case or controversy, but not on hypothetical or speculative situations, unlike in the natural and social sciences (which can address what if or "what could likely happen" scenarios/probabilities that representative institutions like Congress might use to enact legislation).

In doing so, focus on the interdependence of legal rights and remedies, by citing at least one of the healthcare cases we have covered (e.g., breast milk case) to explain your answer.