Question: Explain clearly why courts can only adjudicate (render decisions) based on an actual case or controversy, but not on hypothetical or speculative situations, unlike in
Explain clearly why courts can only adjudicate (render decisions) based on an actual case or controversy, but not on hypothetical or speculative situations, unlike in the natural and social sciences (which can address "what if" or "what would likely happen" scenarios and other probabilities). In doing so, focus on the relationshin between rights and remedies, citing some of the healthcare cases we have covered in class
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
