Question: Explain how the Court's decision in Hamdan ( Hamdan v. Rumsfeld , 2006) differs from its analysis of its jurisdiction in McCardle ( Ex parte
Explain how the Court's decision in Hamdan (Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 2006) differs from its analysis of its jurisdiction in McCardle (Ex parte McCardle, 1869). Given this decision, does it seem that McCardle is still good law? Why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
