explain - theoretically, anyway - making "change innovations" in each of the followingAreas of Organizational Changemight have helped Kodak ease the severity of the conditions that led it to bankruptcy and the challenges facing it now that it's emerged from bankruptcy:changing organization structure and design, changing people and attitudes, and changing processes.

2.judging from the case, explain how, at one point or another, each of the following reasons forFailure to Innovateplayed a role in the process that brought Kodak to bankruptcy:lack of resources, failure to recognize opportunities and resistance to change.

3.you can still buy a digital camera with the Kodak name on it, and you can still print pictures at digital kiosks in many local drugstores. These businesses, however, are no longer owned by Kodak. In addition, Kodak no longer publishes photos online or makes pocket video cameras, camera film, or photographic paper. Having emerged from bankruptcy, Kodak tried to focus on the commercial side of the imaging business, such as packaging labels and graphics and printing solutions to client businesses. It also tried to make components and products that other companies can sell under their own brands.

In what ways does each of the following Forms of Innovationfigure to play a role in Kodak's efforts to rebuild itself after bankruptcy:radical innovations, incremental innovations, technical innovations, product innovations and process innovations?

4. How about you? How surprised are you to learn how fast a blue-chop corporation with a line of household-name products can collapse? Do you think that we live in times that make such stories as Kodak's more or less likely? In your opinion, what's the most important downside of the demise of a company such as Kodak? What's the most important upside?