explain whether you agree with the thoughts on the drawbacks and benefits of having community input on forming an organizational mission statement. Why or why not? Do you think it will increase transparency? Summary below.

There are both advantages and disadvantages to getting input from the community when developing your organization$$s mission statement. On the one hand, the Grand Rapids Police department $($GRPD$)$ risks diluting the focus of their mission statement by including diverse community inputs, leading to a broad or scattered vision, potentially deviating from core objectives $(24$ Hour News $8,2019,00$:$00$:$32).$ Additionally, conflicting opinions among community members over priorities could hinder the consensus$-$building process, making it challenging to set up a unified mission $(24$ Hour News $8,2019,00$:$00$:$57).$ Moreover, the process of gathering input through community meetings and emails can be time$-$consuming and resource$-$intensive for the department $(24$ Hour News $8,2019,00$:$00$:$59).$ However, involving the community in crafting the mission statement can yield several benefits. It can enhance community trust by demonstrating transparency and value for their input, fostering a sense of ownership and partnership $(24$ Hour News $8,2019,00$:$00$:$53).$ Furthermore, aligning the mission statement with community needs ensures that the department's priorities resonate with the people it serves, leading to increased support and cooperation $(24$ Hour News $8,2019,00$:$00$:$57,00$:$01$:$18).$ While the passage doesn't explicitly state whether the community suggestions meet the department's minimum standards, Chief David Rahinsky's mention of seeking a consensus suggests that they aim to incorporate suggestions that align with the department's objectives and values $(24$ Hour News $8,2019,00$:$01$:$10).$ Ultimately, the department will more than likely must evaluate the suggestions they receive against its existing mission and goals to ensure compatibility and feasibility.