explain why the reasoning used in the examples is faulty or illogical by naming the logical fallacy found in the example and explaining why the example is problematic. 1. if your source is making use of induction — that is, drawing a conclusion based on a number of individual examples — does it have enough examples with variety to justify the conclusion? in other words, will your readers be able to make the inductive leap from examples to the conclu-sion you are asking them to make? 2. if your source is making use of deduction, is its conclusion a logical one based on the premises underlying it? to be sure, write out its argument in the form of a syllogism, and confirm that both the major and the minor premises are true. 3. avoid sources that word their thesis statements in absolute terms like all, every, everyone, every¬body, and always. 4. use the list of fallacies in this chapter as a check¬list while you read each of your sources with a critical eye, looking for any breakdown in logic. practice decide whether the reasoning in the following examples is faulty. use the c mon fallacies presented in the previous pages to explain your answers. 1. the presiding judge of a revolutionary tribunal, being asked why people being executed without trial, replies, "why should we put them on trial we know that they're guilty?" 3. ^government has the right to require the wearing of helmets while operating or riding on a motorcycle because of the high rate of head injuries aired in motorcycle accidents. 4. women ought to be permitted to serve in combat. why should men be the only ones to face death and danger? 5. if lady gaga uses truvia, it must taste better than splenda. 6. people will gamble anyway, so why not legalize gambling in this state? 7. because so much money was spent on public education in the last decade while educational achievement declined, more money to improve education can’t be the answer to reversing the decline, 8. he’s a columnist for a campus newspaper, so he must be a pretty good writer, 9. we tend to exaggerate the need for standard english. you don't need much d english for most jobs in this country. 10. it’s discriminatory to mandate that police officers must conform to a certain height and weight. 11.a doctor can charge for a missed appointment, so patients should be charged when a doctor keeps them waiting. 12. because this soft drink contains so many chemicals, it must be unsafe. 13. core requirements should be eliminated. after all, students are paying for r education, so they should be able to earn a diploma by choosing the course they want.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 Its possible that the majority of prisoners are innocent When asked why they dont hold trial the judge has committed the fallacy of hasty generaliza... View the full answer