Question: Explain your answer Q3 What are the final results when the company was addressed their issues? a. Saving more cost b. Increasing the quality c.

Explain your answer

Explain your answer Q3 What are the final results

Q3 What are the final results when the company was addressed their issues?

a. Saving more cost

b. Increasing the quality

c. increasing productivity

d. All answers are correct

Q2 How the company addressed their issues?

a. Increase sales

b. Improve project and portfolio project management

c. Improve quality

d. Reduce cost

Q1 What is the main issues were facing the company?

a. All answers are correct

b. Increasing the cost of project delivery

c. increasing business demands

d. Decreasing the project quality

Case Study As one of the largest U.S. coal producers with approximately 1,600 employees, this $1.4 billion dollar company is a fuel supplier for approximately 4% of the nation's electricity. With a limited staff that was overwhelmed by increasing business demands, project quality began to wane for this young company as they grappled with managing the IT project portfolio. Although projects were being completed, the cost of project delivery was also increasing. The client's leadership team recognized that something was wrong, and knew they needed outside support to evaluate the situation and identify the best what remedies to apply. The client decided the best course of action was to bring in seasoned professionals in project management services and PMO-Champion. The company engaged PM Solutions to perform an evaluation of the current state of affairs and provide guidance in organizational enhancement. At the conclusion of the assessment, PM Solutions presented a list of project and Portfolio project management improvements that would address the specific pain points" of the company in order to help prevent further deterioration in execution. Included with the list was a roadmap for implementation of these enhancements. In just three months, PM Solutions was able to redefine and simplify the company's project management methodology, reorganize PMO operations, institute a new project and portfolio reporting structure, and establish new portfolio governance processes. In tandem, PM Solutions performed a detailed review of all current in-flight projects, and brought them into compliance with the newly implemented methodology. The organization now has a fully vetted, standardized project methodology and portfolio governance process to follow for all future project activities. Implementing methodology changes and restructuring in- flight projects produced immediate, realized savings in project execution productivity, and US $900,000 in non-IT department operations cost avoidance. One such instance of cost avoidance included redefining and re-launching a stalled project intended to lower the operating costs of the client's Maintenance Department. After three weeks of review, redefinition, and re-planning, the project successfully concluded in the following two months. The net result was a decrease of $100,000 in departmental costs from the elimination of the old departmental process

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!