Final rubric section then make lab report

Work limited in Work is more Work is scholarly, Work is somewhat scholarly, | scholarship, critical \"words on a page\" Work is relevant, displays a high mostly relevant, and with a thought, and with little coherent | unacceptable, level of comprehension of | good understanding of understanding of thought. Lacks demonstrating subject, and rubric criteria | subject, and meets rubric subject. Meets most of scholarship, critical | poor effort or are of superb quality. criteria. Writer demonstrates | rubric criteria. thought, and little Writer demonstrates the critical thought, and some Descriptions and understanding of understanding of ability to think critically logic. Descriptions and analyses require the subject. assignment. and logically. Descriptions | analyses are mostly correct, | corrections and contain | Irrelevant Most of the and analyses are correct, relatively concise, with significant amounts of information is rubric ignored concise, and meaningful. minor extraneous content. extraneous or irrelevant | prevalent. Rubric and /or specific Work is error-free. Work contains minor errors. | content. Work contains | content lacking and | content absent. many errors. weak in impact. Content only 70-75% (high school level report) For 85 100% students must show additional abilities: accuracy of data reporting, coherency of thought, understanding of the material, comprehension of key concepts, accurate statement of experimental design and the hypothesis, application, comparison and synthesis of data and background information, insights, deductive reasoning, as well as proper levels of detail