For each question should have an introduction statement, followed by a thesis statement outlining what you are going to discuss. A statement or statements of fact (s) that are supported by peer-reviewed citations. A transition that will make an argument or allow you to compare and contrast a topic you are writing on. A conclusion, wrapping up what you have stated, and finishing your argument.

provide peer reviewed research and link for further research.

1. What pretrial discovery rights does the prosecution have? In light of the government's power to charge a person with a crime which could lead to the loss of property, liberty, or even life as a consequence, is it fair to make the defense discover anything to the prosecution?
2. What is your opinion of preventive detention? Why do you feel this way? Discuss a case involving preventative detention.
3. Discuss the history of the right to appoint counsel in criminal prosecutions and when it applies. Do you believe the right to effective assistance of counsel is a meaningful one, given all of the interpretation it has received by the Supreme Court?
4. Summarize the pros and cons of plea bargaining. Be sure to explainad hoc plea bargaining. How do you feel about this type of plea bargaining and why?
5. Should someone be able to contest a guilty plea? Are the methods currently in place effective? Why or why not? Use case-examples where applicable.