For each question should have an introduction statement, followed by a thesis statement outlining what you are going to discuss. A statement or statements of fact (s) that are supported by peer-reviewed citations. A transition that will make an argument or allow you to compare and contrast a topic you are writing on. A conclusion, wrapping up what you have stated, and finishing your argument.

provide peer reviewed research and link for further research.

1. Can most judges be considered truly impartial? Why do you feel this way?
2. Should criminal trials truly be public? Why or why not? Please use a real-life case example in your answer.
3. Is the use of hearsay against a defendant ever fair? Please provide at least one example in your answer.
4. Discuss your opinion of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). How does this act affect habeas relief in death penalty cases?
5. Find a death penalty case. Summarize the case and discuss whether or not the death penalty is appropriate in this case.