For Leader Analysis Paper #2, please submit a 4-5 page (minimum) double-spaced paper that details the following:

1. Specifically, how did your leader display (or not display) aspects of Communication and Leadership (Unit 4), Recognizing and Leveraging Organizational Culture and Climate (Unit 5), and Developing High Performing Teams (Unit 6). Please include citations and references to Units 4, 5, and 6 reading materials that support your answers.

2. How can you apply the conclusions of your assessment and analysis to leadership roles and responsibilities in your organization?

Rubric

Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccurately described the leader's style, traits and/or behaviours.

5 pts Excellent Fully described. No additional improvement is necessary.

4 pts Good Mostly described. Only minimal improvement is necessary.

3 pts Acceptable Moderately described. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts Unacceptable Minimally described. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts Unacceptable Did not accurately describe.

0 pts No marks

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplied course material to what you learned about the leader.

5 pts Excellent Fully applied. No improvement necessary

4 pts Good Mostly applied. Minimal improvement is necessary.

3 pts Acceptable Moderately applied. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts Unacceptable Minimallyapplied. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts Unacceptable Did not apply course material.

0 pts No marks

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsed citations from the week's reading materials.

5 pts Excellent Fully cited course materials. No improvement is necessary.

4 pts Good Mostly cited course materials. Only minimal improvement necessary.

3 pts Acceptable Moderately cited course materials. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts Unacceptable Minimally cited. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts Unacceptable Did not cite appropriately.

0 pts No marks

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrote with sufficient detail.

5 pts Excellent Fully detailed. No further improvement is necessary.

4 pts Good Mostly detailed. Only minimal improvement is necessary.

3 pts Acceptable Moderately detailed. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts Unacceptable Minimal detail. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts Unacceptable Did not provide sufficient detail.

0 pts No marks

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsed appropriate grammar, punctuation and masters-level writing style

5 pts Excellent Fully used appropriate writing style. No further improvements are necessary.

4 pts Good Mostly used appropriate writing style. Only minimal improvement necessary.

3 pts Accceptable Moderately used appropriate writing style. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts Unacceptable Minimally used appropriate writing style. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts Unacceptable Did not use appropriate writing style.

0 pts No marks

5 pts

Total Points: 25