- For the table data below, please help me create the "Friction factor vs Reynold number graph".

- After creating the graph, please discuss your graphical results. Comment on why some (or all) of the plotted points are above the smooth pipe curve. Are the copper pipe surfaces smooth as claimed? What can be said of points below the smooth pipe curve?

Reynold Friction number Factor (f) Percent error (%) 8216.956 0.0363 10 16408.15 0.0377 39.63 24625.11 0.0248 3.33 32816.31 0.0224 2.61 41033.26 0.0208 5.45 49224.46 0.0192 8.57 10875.85 0.0305 1.67 21771.12 0.0234 6.4 32646.97 0.0218 5.22 43522.81 0.0217 3.33 54418.08 0.0185 7.5Graph 1: Friction Factor vs Reynolds Number Friction Factor vs Reynolds Number Diameter 25.81 mm -Haalands Formula Diameter 19.46 mm 0.04 0.03 0.02 Friction Factor 0.01 0.00 8130 16211 24398 32550 40691 48777 56963 Reynolds Number6. Discuss your graphical results. Comment on why some (or all) of the plotted points are above the smooth pipe curve. Are the copper pipe surfaces smooth as claimed? What can be said of points below the smooth pipe curve? In the graph above the friction factor and Reynolds number are illustrated to be beneath the turbulent flow for the smaller diameter alongside the larger diameter. This is a similar relationship because the transition to the turbulent flow ranges from 1000 to 10000. With the pipes being created with copper, the data is perceived to be smooth with the turbulent curve and the fluctuations on the graph can represent the inconsistencies within the flow