***FROM THE PASSAGE BELOW PUT IN OWN WORDS DO NOT COPY UNLESS U ARE CITING Watson and Hoefer (2014) provide a general overview of using logic models to define a problem and identify inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes.

In your initial post, discuss how application of a logic model would be different for a small nonprofit organization, a large federal agency, or the development of a policy for a specific human service program. How would the leader for each of these organizations engage the participants in the process? Cite examples from the reading. PARAGRAPH FORM****

Per Watson and Hoefer (2014), a logic model is used as a tool to visually represent the theory of change behind an intervention, product, or policy. Although there are different variations of the model, they are used to design programs, assist in implementation, guide evaluation, and consist of various components that come together to achieve specific outcomes. Logic models vary between small nonprofit organizations and large federal agencies.

"The utility of a logic model is in showing how the resources used (inputs) are changed into a program (activities) with closely linked products (outputs) that then lead to changes in clients in the short, medium, and long terms" (Watson and Hoefer, 2014, p. 73). With small nonprofit organizations, logic models are straightforward, simple, clear, and focus on essential components, making communicating with the organization's stakeholders easy. Because nonprofits operate on limited resources, their logic models highlight efficiency and effectiveness that contribute to the outcomes they're looking for. Activities involved are tied to the needs of the community, so tangible changes and responses to challenges should also be apparent in the logic model. As needs evolve, logic models should also be flexible, adjustable, and adaptable based on the outcomes and feedback.

For large federal agencies, logic models are more complex and intricate due to the various programs, policies, and initiatives. They typically account for various connected components, numerous stakeholders, and long-term effects. Because they operate our policies, the goals are on a national level, and activities are linked to mandates, strategic plans, and collaboration with other agencies. Activities also might involve shared resources and combined efforts to address complex societal challenges. Data collection and evaluation is heavily incorporated, and logic models aim for systemic impact. As mentioned in our reading this week from Watson 2014, the idea of a logic model can be described as a representation of how a program, organization or policy works using the interactions of the inputs, outputs, outcomes, and impacts. The way that a program or organization is set up can impact the way that the logic model may be designed for that company. For a small nonprofit organization, the logic model may be simpler and straight to the point so that it can have a main focus for the goals and outcomes to be implemented and developed for the logic model. On the other side, a program within a larger federal agency could have complex policies developed since there are more parties involved with different stakeholders and the logic model can be present to be more comprehensive. The leader of both types of organizations/agencies will heavily require addressing the specific needs and challenges for the human services and populations being served to ensure effectiveness and significance. A logic model is described as a both a systematic and visual tool utilized to comprehend and understand the relationships present amongst inputs, activities, and outputs and the need for these in organizations. They are utilized to accomplish desired outcomes. This model is not only useful for current state but also is used for forward thinking initiatives. When different components of the model are manipulated the user/users can then see how the components may affect intended results.

This model is intended to align leadership and your teams. Additionally, it is common for sharing with the organizations funders because it serves as a tool to provide education and clarity surrounding the nonprofits sought out results.

A Theory of Change is considered a long-term goal that is intended for aspects of broader social change working with others within the system, while the Logic Model is specific in representation of the organization or program from start to finish. The Logic Model is very specific. It is common to develop the Theory of Change prior to the creation of the nonprofits logic model.

Our reading from Watson and Hoefer (2014) stresses the importance of context when utilizing the logic model and how this aligns with the leader's responsibility of enhancing the importance of cooperation among those involved to ensure the model is substantial in capturing the objectives along with the assets of the company.