Garvin $(1988$:$25)$ presented the five approaches to defining quality: transcendent, product$-$based, user$-$based, manufacturing$-$based and value$-$based approaches. Critically analyse the theoretical foundations of each of these five approaches to define quality. Discuss their philosophical foundations $(1$ mark for each philosophical foundation$),$ strengths $(1$ mark for each strength$),$ and limitations in various contexts $(1$ mark for each limitation$)$ in understanding quality. Provide a Human Resource Development $($HRD$-)$ related example for each approach $(1$ mark$).$ Note that answers or examples copied directly from Lesson $09$ will not receive marks.