Give feedback based on the response and how it can be improved.

 Image of Restorative Environment:
Elements that make this environment restorative:
Having warm water gently trickle down my body encourages even more relaxation and reduces stress. My thoughts, sentiments, and emotions can be started again, replenished, and recollected in the shower. It enables fresh starts, the eradication of evil, the pardoning of crimes, and the development of a sense of a complete rebirth. Soft fascination is one of the aspects of my restorative setting, the shower, that supports Kaplan's Attention Restoration Theory since the sound of running water makes it easy for my mind to relax, day-dream, and feel at ease.
Non-Restorative Environment:
All Train stations
Image of non-Restorative Environment:
Elements that make this environment not restorative:
There is nothing fascinating or alluring about constantly passing by train stations. This is a result of the absence of hygiene and unfavorable ideas/designs, such as discomfort in the environment and poor cleanliness. Trains passing by, people using the bells, and other background noises at train stations only serve to create mental weariness and trigger directional attention. Lack of peace, poor aesthetics, and intrusion into personal space make this setting unsatisfying to think about, hence it lacks extent. Despite being accessible, I don't find it to be reassuring or focus diminishing.

Transcribed Image Text:

Criteria and Support of Peer Learning Standards (70%) Exceptional Developed Competent Provides constructive comments that are well considered & well justified (clearly demonstrating areas of need in interlocutors work). Comments are phrased positively. Suggestions are particularly innovative, creative or original - clearly relating to the module content. Provides constructive comments that are well considered & well justified in relation to the module content. Comments are phrased positively. A good attempt at providing constructive comments (suggestions are mostly well considered & well justified). Comment is phrased positively. Satisfactory A reasonable attempt at providing constructive comments (tries to suggest improvements, but suggestions may not be well justified). Comments are phrased positively, or at least not negatively. Communication (30%) Entirely clear, simple and specific expression which is easily understood by a lay audience (especially with regard to explanation of key concepts and ideas). No noteworthy spelling or grammatical errors. Almost entirely clear expression. Language may be obfuscatory. Minor spelling/grammatical errors may be present but do not impact clarity. Generally clear expression. May have some problematic structuring of ideas, but this does not obscure main arguments. Spelling and grammatical errors may be present, but overall work is clear and coherent. Reasonable expression, but lacks clarity/specific details. Vague expression may mask some aspects of main argument. Many spelling and grammatical errors. Structuring of ideas may be problematic in some areas. Criteria and Support of Peer Learning Standards (70%) Exceptional Developed Competent Provides constructive comments that are well considered & well justified (clearly demonstrating areas of need in interlocutors work). Comments are phrased positively. Suggestions are particularly innovative, creative or original - clearly relating to the module content. Provides constructive comments that are well considered & well justified in relation to the module content. Comments are phrased positively. A good attempt at providing constructive comments (suggestions are mostly well considered & well justified). Comment is phrased positively. Satisfactory A reasonable attempt at providing constructive comments (tries to suggest improvements, but suggestions may not be well justified). Comments are phrased positively, or at least not negatively. Communication (30%) Entirely clear, simple and specific expression which is easily understood by a lay audience (especially with regard to explanation of key concepts and ideas). No noteworthy spelling or grammatical errors. Almost entirely clear expression. Language may be obfuscatory. Minor spelling/grammatical errors may be present but do not impact clarity. Generally clear expression. May have some problematic structuring of ideas, but this does not obscure main arguments. Spelling and grammatical errors may be present, but overall work is clear and coherent. Reasonable expression, but lacks clarity/specific details. Vague expression may mask some aspects of main argument. Many spelling and grammatical errors. Structuring of ideas may be problematic in some areas.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Based on the provided criteria and standards for supporting peer learning and communication heres fe... View the full answer