Given Argument 1

All cogent arguments are strong arguments. All weak argumentsare not strong arguments. Therefore, all weak arguments are notcogent arguments.

Proposed Reconstructions of Given Argument 1

Syllogism A:

All cogent arguments are strong arguments.

Therefore, no weak arguments are cogent arguments.

Because, no weak arguments are strong arguments.

Syllogism B:

No weak arguments are strong arguments.

All cogent arguments are strong arguments.

Therefore, no weak arguments are cogent arguments.

Syllogism C:

All cogent arguments are strong arguments.

No weak arguments are strong arguments.

Therefore, no weak arguments are cogent arguments.

Which of the following best describes the reason that GivenArgument 1 fails to be in standard form?

The terms in this argument are not used in the samesense throughout the argument.

The premises in this argument are not listed in theorder required for standard form.

The statements in this argument are not standard-formcategorical propositions.

The two occurrences of each term in this argumentare not identical.

Which of the proposed reconstructions of Given Argument1 is a standard-form categorical syllogism?

Syllogism B

None of these

Syllogism A

Syllogism C

Given Argument 2

All lizards are reptiles. Therefore, no warm-blooded creaturesare lizards. Because, no reptiles are warm-blooded creatures.

Proposed Reconstructions of Given Argument 2

Syllogism A:

No reptiles are warm-blooded creatures.

Therefore, no warm-blooded creatures are lizards.

Because, all lizards are reptiles.

Syllogism B:

No warm-blooded creatures are lizards.

Because, all lizards are reptiles.

And, no reptiles are warm-blooded creatures.

Syllogism C:

All lizards are reptiles.

No reptiles are warm-blooded creatures.

Therefore, no warm-blooded creatures are lizards.

Which of the following best describes the reason that GivenArgument 2 fails to be in standard form?

The premises in this argument are not listed in theorder required for standard form.

The two occurrences of each term in this argumentare not identical.

The terms in this argument are not used in the samesense throughout the argument.

The statements in this argument are not standard-formcategorical propositions.

Which of the proposed reconstructions of Given Argument2 is a standard-form categorical syllogism?

Syllogism A

None of these

Syllogism C

Syllogism B

Given Argument 3

No human beings are beings who know everything. All omniscientbeings are beings who know everything. Therefore, no omniscientbeings are people.

Proposed Reconstructions of Given Argument 3

Syllogism A:

No human beings are beings who know everything.

All omniscient beings are beings who know everything.

Therefore, no omniscient beings are human beings.

Syllogism B:

All omniscient beings are beings who know everything.

No human beings are beings who know everything.

Therefore, no omniscient beings are human beings.

Syllogism C:

No human beings are beings who know everything.

Therefore, no omniscient beings are human beings.

Because, all omniscient beings are beings who knoweverything.

Which of the following best describes the reason that GivenArgument 3 fails to be in standard form?

The terms in this argument are not used in the samesense throughout the argument.

The statements in this argument are not standard-formcategorical propositions.

The two occurrences of each term in this argumentare not identical.

The premises in this argument are not listed in theorder required for standard form.

Which of the proposed reconstructions of Given Argument3 is a standard-form categorical syllogism?

Syllogism A

Syllogism C

None of these

Syllogism B

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Sound Arguments Definition A sound contention could be a substantial contention that has true premises Firstly a sound argument may be a deductive contention Its attempting to build up conclusive supp... View the full answer